Amendment I to the Constitution of the United States

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Things That Will
Destroy Us:

Politics without principle;
Pleasure without conscience;
Wealth without work;
Knowledge without character;
Business without morality;
Science without humanity;
Worship without sacrifice.

- Mahatma Gandhi

 Your Comments
Welcome Guest   
 Subject :House Republican Plan for America's Job Creators.. 2011-07-28 02:27:07 
admin
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 01:18:48
Posts: 15
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : House Republican Plan for America's Job Creators

Empowering Families, Small Businesses and Entrepreneurs


Empower Small Business Owners and Reduce Regulatory Burdens:
• Require congressional review and approval of any government regulations that have a significant impact on the economy or burden small businesses.
• Audit existing and pending regulations to identify and address those that hinder economic growth.


Fix the Tax Code to Help Job Creators:
• Increase American competitiveness to spur investment and create more American jobs by streamlining the tax code and lowering the tax rate for businesses and individuals including small business owners to no more than 25%.
• Reform the tax code to allow American businesses to bring back their overseas profits without having to pay a tax penalty so they can invest in our economy and create American jobs.


Increase Competitiveness for American Manufacturers:
• Pass the three pending free trade agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea to create up to 250,000 jobs.
• Continue to open new markets to American made products.


Encourage Entrepreneurship and Growth:
• Modernize our patent system to protect our nation’s innovators, discourage frivolous lawsuits, and expedite patent reviews.
• Re-Authorize and improve federal programs and approval processes to streamline development of new products.
• Remove barriers to building a first class workforce so that the United States can compete in the global marketplace and lead the way in technological development and growth.


Maximize Domestic Energy Production to Ensure an Energy Policy for the 21st Century:
• Promote lower energy prices through increased domestic production.
• Encourage all forms of energy production.


Pay Down America’s Unsustainable Debt Burden and Start Living Within our Means:
• Build upon the House Republicans’ Budget by enacting significant spending cuts.

IP Logged
 Subject :Evangelicals and the Gay Moral Revolution.. 2011-07-26 23:56:11 
admin
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 01:18:48
Posts: 15
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Evangelicals and the Gay Moral Revolution

Evangelicals and the Gay Moral Revolution

http://www.illinoisfamily.org/news/contentview.asp?c=35348

7/14/2011 3:50:00 PM
By R. Albert Mohler Jr. - Wall Street Journal

The Christian church has faced no shortage of challenges in its 2,000-year history. But now it's facing a challenge that is shaking its foundations: homosexuality.

To many onlookers, this seems strange or even tragic. Why can't Christians just join the revolution?

And make no mistake, it is a moral revolution. As philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah of Princeton University demonstrated in his recent book, "The Honor Code," moral revolutions generally happen over a long period of time. But this is hardly the case with the shift we've witnessed on the question of homosexuality.

In less than a single generation, homosexuality has gone from something almost universally understood to be sinful, to something now declared to be the moral equivalent of heterosexuality-and deserving of both legal protection and public encouragement. Theo Hobson, a British theologian, has argued that this is not just the waning of a taboo. Instead, it is a moral inversion that has left those holding the old morality now accused of nothing less than "moral deficiency."

The liberal churches and denominations have an easy way out of this predicament. They simply accommodate themselves to the new moral reality. By now the pattern is clear: These churches debate the issue, with conservatives arguing to retain the older morality and liberals arguing that the church must adapt to the new one. Eventually, the liberals win and the conservatives lose. Next, the denomination ordains openly gay candidates or decides to bless same-sex unions.

This is a route that evangelical Christians committed to the full authority of the Bible cannot take. Since we believe that the Bible is God's revealed word, we cannot accommodate ourselves to this new morality. We cannot pretend as if we do not know that the Bible clearly teaches that all homosexual acts are sinful, as is all human sexual behavior outside the covenant of marriage. We believe that God has revealed a pattern for human sexuality that not only points the way to holiness, but to true happiness.

Thus we cannot accept the seductive arguments that the liberal churches so readily adopt. The fact that same-sex marriage is a now a legal reality in several states means that we must further stipulate that we are bound by scripture to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman-and nothing else.

We do so knowing that most Americans once shared the same moral assumptions, but that a new world is coming fast. We do not have to read the polls and surveys; all we need to do is to talk to our neighbors or listen to the cultural chatter.

In this most awkward cultural predicament, evangelicals must be excruciatingly clear that we do not speak about the sinfulness of homosexuality as if we have no sin. As a matter of fact, it is precisely because we have come to know ourselves as sinners and of our need for a savior that we have come to faith in Jesus Christ. Our greatest fear is not that homosexuality will be normalized and accepted, but that homosexuals will not come to know of their own need for Christ and the forgiveness of their sins.

This is not a concern that is easily expressed in sound bites. But it is what we truly believe.

It is now abundantly clear that evangelicals have failed in so many ways to meet this challenge. We have often spoken about homosexuality in ways that are crude and simplistic. We have failed to take account of how tenaciously sexuality comes to define us as human beings. We have failed to see the challenge of homosexuality as a Gospel issue. We are the ones, after all, who are supposed to know that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only remedy for sin, starting with our own.

We have demonstrated our own form of homophobia-not in the way that activists have used that word, but in the sense that we have been afraid to face this issue where it is most difficult . . . face to face.

My hope is that evangelicals are ready now to take on this challenge in a new and more faithful way. We really have no choice, for we are talking about our own brothers and sisters, our own friends and neighbors, or maybe the young person in the next pew.

There is no escaping the fact that we are living in the midst of a moral revolution. And yet, it is not the world around us that is being tested, so much as the believing church. We are about to find out just how much we believe the Gospel we so eagerly preach.

Rev. Mohler is the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY.

IP Logged
 Subject :Judicial Fight for Right to Carry Advances in IL!!.. 2011-07-08 12:54:06 
admin
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 01:18:48
Posts: 15
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Judicial Fight for Right to Carry Advances in IL!!

Firearm Alert Vol. 6, No.13                                                                                                                    July 8,  2011
SAF Files Motion to Suspend
IL Ban on Lawful Carry of Firearms
This week the U.S. Court of Appeals declared Chicago's ban on gun ranges unconstitutional but that is not all they said (see below).  They went on to say laws restricting the Right to Keep and Bear Arms must be weighed according to how severely they restrict the right of law-abiding citizens.  Based on the ruling, the Second Amendment Foundation filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against IL's complete ban on carrying a firearm for personal protection:
12500 NE Tenth Place  • Bellevue, WA   98005 (425) 454-7012  • FAX (425) 451-3959  •www.saf.orgFor Immediate Release:   7/7/2011 BELLEVUE, WA – Capitalizing on its federal appeals court victory Wednesday in Ezell v. City of Chicago, the Second Amendment Foundation today moved for a preliminary injunction against the State of Illinois to prevent further enforcement of that state’s prohibitions on firearms carry in public by law-abiding citizens.
The motion was filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois in Springfield. Joining SAF in this motion are Illinois Carry and four private citizens, Michael Moore, Charles Hooks, Peggy Fechter and Jon Maier. The underlying case is known as Moore v. Madigan.
Illinois is the only state in the nation with such prohibitions. The state neither allows open carry or concealed carry, which runs afoul of recent U.S. Supreme Court Second Amendment rulings, including last year’s landmark ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago, another SAF case. SAF was represented in McDonald and Ezell by attorney Alan Gura, who noted after yesterday’s appeals court win – forcing a temporary injunction against the city’s ban on gun ranges that the city immediately changed after the decision was announced – that “Even Chicago politicians must respect the people’s fundamental civil rights…Gun rights are coming to Chicago. The only question is how much the city’s intransigence will cost taxpayers along the way.”
“Now that the Seventh Circuit has recognized that the deprivation of the right of armed self-defense is an inherently irreparable injury, it is clear that Illinois’ law-abiding gun owners are entitled to a protective injunction,” said attorney David Jensen of New York, who, along with Glen Ellyn, IL attorney David Sigale, is representing SAF and the other plaintiffs.
“Yesterday’s win was a wake-up call to Chicago,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb. “Today’s motion is a signal to the Illinois Legislature that the state’s total ban on carrying of firearms for personal protection is counter to both Supreme Court rulings on the Second Amendment, and yesterday’s ruling by the Seventh Circuit appeals panel that shredded Chicago’s gun ordinance. Our victory Wednesday and today’s motion are key components of SAF’s overall mission to win back firearms freedoms one lawsuit at a time.”
Help IllinoisCarry.com in the
Fight for Right to Carry
We are entering a very critical time in our fight for Right to Carry and restoration of the Second Amendment here in IL.  Your support makes it possible for IllinoisCarry to continue the fight for your right to keep and bear arms.
Please contribute!
Support IllinoisCarry.com
Donations made to IllinoisCarry.com are not
tax deductible
IllinoisCarry.com video Rights Denied in Illinois
We thank each and every one of you for your diligence and commitment to the Second Amendment. Please feel free to forward this Alert to your friends, family, and other contacts.


Sincerely,
Valinda Rowe
IllinoisCarry.com spokesperson
IP Logged
 Subject :The Best Memory System.. 2011-05-09 20:58:28 
rdavis
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 17:21:02
Posts: 14
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : The Best Memory System

THE BEST MEMORY SYSTEM

 

Forget the kindness that you do,

As soon as you have done it;

Forget the praise that falls on you,

The moment you have won it.

 

Forget the slander that you hear,

Before you can repeat it;

Forget each slight, each spite, each sneer,

Wherever you may meet it.

 

Remember every kindness done,

To you, whate'er its measure;

Remember praise by others won.

And pass it on with pleasure.

 

Remember every promise made,

And keep it to the letter;

Remember those who lend you aid,

And be a grateful debtor.

 

Remember all the happiness

That comes your way in living;

Forget each worry and distress,

Be hopeful and forgiving.

 

Remember good, remember truth,

Remember heaven's above you.

And you will find through age and youth

True joy and hearts to love you.

 

Anon

 

IP Logged
 Subject :Partnerships For Better or For Worse.. 2011-04-05 01:21:06 
smdelorme
Joined: 2010-03-25 20:23:39
Posts: 2
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Partnerships For Better or For Worse

April 2011

Letter to the Editor          PARTNERSHIPS FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE

Chicken and Gasoline

It all began in Corbin, Kentucky in the midst of the Great Depression.  Harlan Sanders opened a restaurant in the small front room of a gas station he operated.  He named it, "Sanders Court and Cafe."  By 1940, Sanders expanded his restaurant to accommodate 142 people, introduced his "original recipe" and was given the honorary title of "Kentucky Colonel" by the governor.  The Colonel approved his first franchise located in Salt Lake City, Utah on a handshake and marketed his now "secret recipe" chicken to restaurant owners all across the country.  By 1960, Sanders had 190 Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise restaurants in the United States.  Sanders sold his interest in KFC for $2 million in 1964.  By 1969 Kentucky Fried Chicken was listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  KFC was eventually sold to RJ Reynolds, then to PepsiCo and finally spun off along with PepsiCo's Pizza Hut and Taco Bell eateries to Tricon Global Restaurants.  Today, more than a billion of the Colonel's "finger lick'n good" chicken dinners are served every year in over 80 countries.

Politicians and Executive Orders

In 1958, New York City Mayor Robert F. Wagner theorized the best way to ensure his own re-election was to garner the voting support of the rather large city workforce.  To accomplish this he signed into law by executive order the "Little Wagner Act" granting city employees the right to collectively bargain for wages and benefits.  His re-election bid was won handily.  The following year a revolution was triggered when Wisconsin Governor Gaylord Nelson signed the Municipal Employee Relations Act granting state wide public employees collective bargaining rights.  Not only was it the first state to grant such rights but also the first to grant teachers the right to unionize.  Encouraged by the accomplishment of Mayor Wagner and the expansion of government obligations in Wisconsin, politicians all across the country began securing collective bargaining rights for their public employees in an effort to capture future votes and guarantee continued re-election for themselves.  The tactic was so successful, it even attracted the attention of then President John F. Kennedy.  Climbing on the pro-public union bandwagon, Kennedy signed into law Executive Order Number 10988 granting collective bargaining rights to all federal employees.  The year was 1962.

Follow the Money

Over the years, union support for Democrat political candidates has grown exponentially along with their legislative influence and power.  In 2010, America's top 20 labor unions gave over $68 million in campaign contributions for candidates on the federal level.  Ninety-four percent of that money went to Democrats, 4% to Republicans.  On the state and local level, 15 labor unions gave at least $1 million to Democrat candidates during the 2008 and 2010 campaigns.  Combined donations exceed $206 million.  Ninety-one percent of that money was given to Democrats.

The Truth Will Set Us Free

In July of 2009, general counsel of the mighty National Education Association, Robert Chanin, candidly characterized the scope of the union when he said:  "Despite what some among us would like to believe, [the NEA is effective] not because of our creative ideas.  It is not because of the merit of our positions.  It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child.  NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.  And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year,"  There it is folks. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.  How about you?  Thanks for being honest, Bob.  At least we know where you stand.

From Humble Beginnings

No one could have predicted combining fried chicken with a gas station would lead to the birth of a multi-million dollar conglomerate, but many predicted the melding of politicians with the ability to unilaterally legislate and tax would be disastrous for our nation.  For the good of our country, the partnership of America and the Constitution must be rekindled.  In the words of Patrick Henry, "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."   Amen Mr. Henry, Amen.

 

Sue DeLorme

 

IP Logged
 Subject :Re:Enabling - Twisted Love, Misguided Compassion.. 2011-01-22 22:36:16 
rdavis
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 17:21:02
Posts: 14
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Enabling - Twisted Love, Misguided Compassion

Good analogy. Sure has me concerned.
IP Logged
 Subject :Enabling - Twisted Love, Misguided Compassion.. 2011-01-22 01:21:41 
smdelorme
Joined: 2010-03-25 20:23:39
Posts: 2
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Enabling - Twisted Love, Misguided Compassion

While surfing the cable channels one day, I stumbled upon a program chronicling the lives of the morbidly obese.  One story revolved around the life of a nineteen- year-old  who weighed over 500 pounds.  His mother attended to his every need, including disposal of his bodily waste and keeping his many skin flaps and folds clean. A large part of her day was spent providing him with food.  Whatever he wanted she either freshly prepared in the kitchen or went to the drive-thru to pick up.  After observing the mother's routine, it wasn't difficult to imagine how this young man ended up so grossly overweight.   Doctors advised if he did not lose the extra pounds, he would die.  The story followed the family as the young man was hospitalized and prepared for fat removal surgery and several weeks thereafter, gastric by-pass surgery. The loving but destructive relationship between parent and child was obvious to hospital personnel as the mother undermined his diet by bringing in extra food and continually chastising his physical therapists for making him walk too much.  The show ended questioning the level of weight-loss and long term survival this nineteen-year-old would attain, given his mother's constant negative interference.  No doubt she loves him, but her enabling is killing him.  Loving sometimes means saying "yes,"  but more often, it means saying "no."

A Campaign Promise Kept

Candidate Pat Quinn made it clear he was in favor of and would support raising taxes in Illinois.  Governor Pat Quinn not only followed through with his promise, but also raised taxes more than he initially said he would!  Those, who by their votes put this man and others like him into office, are the enablers.  Our state government though bloated, overweight and steering us onto a path toward collective ruin, continues to want more.  "Feed me!" demands Governor Quinn and the enablers spring into action.  Their misguided sense of compassion is forcing us all into a relationship of  mutual dependence.  They need our money so they can stay in power.  We need for them to give it back to us so we can stay alive.  This relationship is not merely unhealthy, it is sick.  And it needs to change.

Feeding The Beast

A look at the  Citizens Against Government Waste 2010 Piglet Book provides insight into Illinois' spending habits.  Health and Human Services was given the largest spending appropriation totaling $24.7 billion.  Included in this figure are payments for things like individual ethnic health service organizations totaling $8,474,706 and disease awareness and research programs totaling $12,470,953. The Department of Human Services spent $17,691,700 for "employability development." Obviously, all of that money didn't develop very much as unemployment continues to hover close to 10%.  Education was given the second largest spending appropriation for 2010 totaling $14.5 billion.  A significant chunk of this cash went to the University of Illinois, SIU and Northern Illinois University for personal services and related other operations to the tune of $1,084.417,811 collectively.  In addition, money was given to employees for continuing education tuition and fees totaling $1,049,639, with a significant amount of those dollars being spent in out of state institutions in Kentucky, Iowa, Colorado, Michigan and Indiana.  With this kind of spending going on, it is not surprising that in a January 8th article in the Wall Street Journal, Stephen Moore reported Illinois has a budget deficit of $15 billion and an unfunded pension liability of  $80 billion. Currently, there are 536 retirees collecting pensions in excess of $100,000 each annually.  They alone are costing Illinois taxpayers $68.2 million.  And I have only scratched the surface.

Facing Reality

Illinois taxpayers are at the breaking point.  A combined state and average local sales tax rate of 8.22%, 8th highest in the nation, a 39-cent-per-gallon gas tax, 6th highest in the nation and a corporate income tax rate of 9.5%, the 4th highest in the nation makes Illinois a very unattractive home for current or potential businesses.  As owners close or move their operations to other states, the pool of taxpayers remaining will dwindle, and their financial burden will increase.  Giving more money to those who have shown they cannot control their spending, is akin to giving more food to those who cannot control their eating.  Quinn's tax increases must be repealed.  It will cause pain, but continuing to feed this obese bureaucracy will do more than cause pain.  It will destroy Illinois.

 

Sue DeLorme

IP Logged
 Subject :St Clair County Employee Wages 2010.. 2011-01-20 00:09:08 
admin
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 01:18:48
Posts: 15
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : St Clair County Employee Wages 2010

From the Belleville News Democrat - Eye on Government

St Clair County Employee Wages in 2010

IP Logged
Last Edited On: 2011-01-20 00:12:20 By admin for the Reason Changed subject.
 Subject :Pachyderm Club 2010.. 2011-01-01 01:19:53 
rdavis
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 17:21:02
Posts: 14
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Pachyderm Club 2010

METRO EAST PACHYDERM CLUB – A GOOD 2010 YEAR

 

Thanks to the very capable leadership of Pachyderm Club President Robert Lyons and a great Board of Directors the Club had a very nice year for 2010. We had 78 speakers/programs which included almost all of the state and local candidates for election in November, and some super educational programs about our local County government agencies. We learned about all levels of the Education process from teacher to Regional Superintendent, from private to public schools, and about how our tax dollars are spent.

 

Metro East Pachyderms played a large part in supporting our County Republican Party by helping with the Shriner Parade, staffing the County Fair Booth and helping with election activities such as putting up signs, going door-to-door and working the phone centers. Several members also helped train precinct committeemen and election judges. The Club has many members in elective office, such as Precinct Committeemen, Mayor, Aldermen, and County Board Representatives.

 

Pachyderm Club membership increased to 84 for the year with an average visitor attendance at meetings of about ten visitors. Most of this increase was thanks to our Club Secretary Mary Thurman who never let any visitor get past her without a handout and an invitation to join. We also owe some thanks to several members who brought new members.

 

An inherent goal of the Pachyderm organization is to support the local Republican Party. The St Clair County Republican Party has progressed greatly due primarily to the skilled leadership of the Chairman, Jon McLean. The substantial increase in Republican votes in our 200 precincts tells the story very well. New organization strategies implemented by Chairman McLean created an environment of enthusiasm for county Republicans and the Vote got out this year.

 

We are all looking forward to an even more productive and fun year for 2011. We should be ready for the next election year with even more shared effort and input.

Richard Davis
President

IP Logged
 Subject :Democrat or democratic?.. 2010-09-03 07:01:06 
rdavis
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 17:21:02
Posts: 14
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Democrat or democratic?

Today, while watching Stuart Varney filling in for Neil Cavuto, my wife and I overheard Virginia Rep Connelly (D) tell Stuart (when Stuart referred to the "Democrat Party"), "...we prefer to be called the Democratic Party, rather than Democrat Party. We have talked for years about how the media and about everyone else has become accustomed to using the adjective "democratic", rather than the noun "Democrat". I suppose it sounds like they are democratic and the Republicans aren't. I think we should all start emphasing "Democrat Party" when we talk and email and text. How about that!!!

IP Logged
 Subject :Re:Taxes and Congress.. 2010-08-18 23:15:18 
candidate
Joined: 2010-08-19 07:47:10
Posts: 1
Location: Waterloo, Illinois
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Taxes and Congress

Hello, I’m Glenn Farley, Republican candidate for state representative 116th district. I’m writing this letter to discuss with you the perils facing the state of Illinois. We are facing a 2010 midterm election that is of great importance. It is important because of the critical condition of our state. A condition that is so critical that we must start correcting it now, not two or three elections from now. With all the problems facing our state and our country it is very difficult to know which way to go this upcoming election. We the citizens, sense the urgency to start turning things around, but how do we do it? We know that business as usual in Springfield is not acceptable. Who is to blame, which party do we choose? Which party is closer to putting Illinois on a path to recovery? We have all aligned ourselves with one party or another for whatever the reason. But we all have one thing in common; we have developed a lack of trust in the state government to solve our state’s problems. As frustrating as the situation is we cannot just throw up our hands and do nothing. Some people say, “Vote them all out and put new people in office”. I tend to agree! We need to use the one thing the “Founding Fathers” gave us to correct “Bad Government”. Our vote! Your vote is very important! It can send the message to Springfield ”We have had enough”. Enough of the over spending, high taxes, destroying jobs and wrecking the state economy. We want it fixed and we want it fixed now! Now, before it is too late. Now, before the state defaults and the economic situation gets really ugly! We can send this message loud and clear if we use our vote wisely. If we use our vote to choose a candidate that is aligned with the party that will truly address the issues. We do not want to vote out all incumbents! We want to vote out all incumbents that are a part of destructive behavior in the capital. The party that is ruining the state is the “Chicago Democrats”. They are running the state into the ground with their liberal ideas and over spending. There is a big difference between Southern Illinois democrats and Chicago Democrats. Southern Illinois Democrats are conservative in nature with a greater sense of patriotism for their state and country. They lean toward the values of common sense and fiscal responsibility, respect for life and religion, respect for our Constitution and laws. Unlike the “Chicago bunch”. Because of these values the Southern Illinois Democrat should consider voting outside his party this election. This is because our patriotism to state and country is far greater than any one political party. We know that any vote for a democrat in Illinois is a vote for the “Chicago machine”. We know that the “Chicago political machine” is ruining state government and does not recognize Southern Illinois as significant. Remember to vote democrat is a vote for Michael Madigan and the Chicago machine. It is this way because there is no Chicago Republican machine and Republicans tend to align themselves more evenly throughout the state. We are speaking of the Illinois Republican party not the “George Bush” party. I reach out to all my friends and neighbors in Southern Illinois no matter what party. I ask all Southern Illinoisans, the farmers who are the backbone of our region, to the small business people who control the economy in our district, and all citizens to consider their vote carefully this election. Vote to stop the over spending. Vote to lower taxes and create jobs. Vote to promote small business and recover the economy. Vote Republican! Vote for a “New Voice” to speak loud and clearly. A voice to say “we have had enough” we want it fixed and we want it fixed now! Sincerely, Glenn C. Farley Republican candidate, State House of Representatives 116th District
IP Logged
 Subject :Taxes and Congress.. 2010-07-24 00:45:19 
TeriDavisNewman
Joined: 2009-11-21 20:55:36
Posts: 3
Location: Highland IL
  
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Taxes and Congress

In reference to what I mentioned yesterday (July 23 2010) in my talk to the group, this came from Erick Erickson at Red State.  It dovetails exactly with my view that the government thinks that we are their bank.

Your money? The government’s “income”

There was an interesting comment made on the floor of the United States Senate yesterday.

I first noticed in from Senator Jim DeMint’s twitter feed. DeMint tweeted, “Sen. Dorgan just said a vote for tax cuts is a vote to ‘reduce this country’s income. To Democrats, it’s the government’s money. Not yours.”

Really? I mean it wouldn’t surprise me, but we rarely hear the Democrats speak so bluntly about it. But sure enough, here is the rush transcript from the floor yesterday from 4:36 p.m.:

THOSE WHO CRIED THE LOUDEST ON THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE THESE DAYS — RIGHT NOW — ARE THE VERY ONES THAT VOTED TO REDUCE THIS COUNTRY’S INCOME WITH THE BIGGEST BENEFITS GOING TO THE WEALTHIEST AMERICANS.

You can watch it here.

Really Senator Dorgan? Voting to give Americans back their own money was a vote to “reduce this country’s income with the biggest benefits going to the wealthiest Americans?”

Certainly cutting taxes reduces the governments’ income in a static calculation, but we also know that revenue into the treasury went up after those tax cuts.

The Democrats really do think it is their money.

IP Logged
 Subject :OBAMA MAY GET INTERNET.. 2010-07-10 00:34:46 
TeriDavisNewman
Joined: 2009-11-21 20:55:36
Posts: 3
Location: Highland IL
  
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : OBAMA MAY GET INTERNET

Sen. Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has introduced legislation that would grant the President emergency authority to protect the Internet before or during a cyber attack, a proposal that is raising the ire of business people, academics, and industry analysts. The committee unanimously approved the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act of 2010 on June 28, moving the bill to the Senate for a full vote.
Among the Act’s components is the establishment of an office of cyberspace policy to be housed within the White House. The Act also calls for a new division within the Homeland Security Department to handle various cyber-security policies.
The one aspect of the bill eliciting the most concern is the so-called “kill switch,” which is how opponents describe the emergency authority given the President over the Internet in the event vulnerabilities are exploited. Lieberman did little to assuage this concern when on June 20 he told CNN’s Candy Crowley, “Right now, China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in a case of war. We need to have that here, too.”
Bill Seen As Authoritarian
If enacted, the legislation would grant the President power to seize control of Internet assets in this country, similar to the control China exerts over the Internet within its borders, said Eric Garris, founder of antiwar.com.
“We’re not China; we have freedom here,” said Garris. “After 9-11, the Internet was essential to keep people from panicking. If the Internet had been shut down, there would have been more rumors and paranoia. There would be no facts getting to the people outside of what they could get on television. And there’s no guarantee that television wouldn’t be shut down as well.”
Garris added: “While fear-mongering may help Lieberman convince the public that it needs saving from the Internet, the only danger lurking in cyberspace is an authoritarian information monopoly. Washington’s most effective power grabs are always sold as needed security, but, predictably, they quickly manifest into little more than relinquished civil liberties.”
Legislative Trial Balloon
The legislation in its current form isn’t likely to pass, Garris says, but it could set the tone for more modest but still objectionable legislation in the future.
“Lieberman is sending this up as a trial balloon,” Garris explains. “They will send up a trial balloon at the extreme in order to get more moderate legislation through. It’s like the FCC’s attempts to take over regulation of the Internet. It marks a slow but steady government attempt to take over.
“The Internet scares the government because it empowers the people,” he added. “If they have information, then they can disseminate it. There are a lot of things on the Web and on YouTube that are extremely embarrassing to politicians. If it is not in control of the politicians, then it is the enemy of politicians.”
Freedom to Unplug Preferred
“There is certainly a precedent for a Presidential kill switch on the Internet, which can be found in places like Iran, North Korea, and China, not exactly ‘free and open’ political/economic societies,” said Patrick Gray, president of Prevoyance Group, Inc., a business strategy consulting company headquartered outside Charlotte, North Carolina.
“I don’t know that such an idea is in the best interest of U.S. citizens,” he continued. “Surely the Internet could be used as a source of attack by a nefarious entity, but the solution to mitigating such an attack seems relatively simple: Allow individual companies and government entities to make their own decision to unplug rather than putting the power to shut down the Internet in the hands of a single person.”
Gray added: “It may be cliché to invoke the founding fathers, but I have a hard time imagining any of them would advocate putting the power to disable one of the most amazing tools for free political discourse since the printing press in the hands of a single person or government entity.”
‘Horrific Consequences’ to Economy
Businesses would suffer as well, says Peter Vogel, chair of the Dallas office of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP. “With the economic dependency [on the Internet] of virtually every major business in the United States, any President's power to shut down the Internet could cause a significant economic disaster—bigger even than the 2008-09 meltdown. As it is, cyber-terrorists are trying to do this all the time now, and we barely avoid major shutdowns daily.
“When Russia took over the Internet in Georgia a few years ago, the consequences were staggering. I can see no benefit, only horrific consequences to the U.S. economy,” he added.
The effectiveness of such legislation is also questionable at best, said Derek Bambauer, assistant professor of law at the Brooklyn Law School.
“The largest problem with Sen. Lieberman's proposal is that it won't work,” Bambauer said. “The Internet's decentralized design means there is no single kill switch that a President can flip to shut down the network. At best, the proposed legislation is a distraction; at worst, it will antagonize other countries and Internet stakeholders, whose support is essential to cybersecurity and to U.S. national security.
“The Internet is not a steel mill; it’s impossible to seize it, and counterproductive to suggest trying,” he concluded.
Phil Britt (spenterprises@wowway.com) writes from South Holland, Illinois.
Internet Info:
Text of Senate Bill 3480 - Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act of 2010:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3480/text.

IP Logged
 Subject :WE THE PEOPLE ARE COMING! An open letter to our nation's leadership.. 2010-01-26 03:09:31 
admin
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 01:18:48
Posts: 15
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : WE THE PEOPLE ARE COMING! An open letter to our nation's leadership

GLENN BECK: I got a letter from a woman in Arizona . She writes an open letter to our nation's leadership:


"I am a home grown American citizen, 53, registered Democrat all my life. Before the last presidential election I registered as a Republican because I no longer felt the Democratic Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. Now I no longer feel the Republican Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. The fact is I no longer feel any political party or representative in Washington represents my views or works to pursue the issues important to me.   Instead, we are burdened with Congressional Dukes and Duchesses who think they know better than the citizens they are supposed to represent.


There must be someone. Please tell me who you are. Please stand up and tell me that you are there and that you're willing to fight for our Constitution as it was written. Please stand up now.

You might ask yourself what my views and issues are that I would feel so horribly disenfranchised by both major political parties. What kind of nut-job am I? Well, these briefly are the views and issues for which I seek representation

Oneillegal immigration. I want you to stop coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders. Close the underground tunnels... Stop the violence and the trafficking in drugs and people. No amnesty, not again. Been there, done that, no resolution.


P.S., I'm not a racist. This is not to be confused with legal immigration.


Two, the STIMULUS bill. I want it repealed and I want no further funding supplied to it. We told you No, but you did it anyway. I want the remaining unfunded 95% repealed. Freeze, repeal.


Three: Czars. I want the circumvention of our constitutional checks and balances stopped immediately. Fire the czars. No more czars. Government officials answer to the process, not to the president.. Stop trampling on our Constitution, and honor it.


Four, cap and trade. The debate on global warming is not over. There are many conflicting opinions and it is too soon for this radical legislation. Quit throwing our nation into politically-correct quicksand.


Five, universal healthcare. I will not be rushed into another expensive decision that will burden me, my children, and grandchildren. Don't you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night without even reading it. Slow down!  Fix only what is broken -- we have the best health care system in the world -- and test any new program in one or two states first.


Six, growing government control. I want states rights and sovereignty fully restored. I want less government in my life, not more. More is not better! Shrink it down. Mind your own business.  You have enough to take care of with your real [Constitutional] obligations. Why don't you start there.


Seven, ACORN. I do not want ACORN and its affiliates in charge of our 2010 census. I want them investigated. I also do not want mandatory escrow fees contributed to them every time on every real estate deal that closes -- how did they pull that one off?  Stop the funding to ACORN and its affiliates pending impartial audits and investigations. I do not trust them with taking the census with our taxpayer money. I don't trust them with any of our taxpayer money. Face up to the allegations against them and get it resolved before taxpayers get any more involved with them. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, hello. Stop protecting your political buddies. You work for us, the people. Investigate.


Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine. I have always worked for people with more money than I have because they gave me jobs -- and that is the only redistribution of wealth that I will support. I never got a job from a poor person! Why do you want me to hate my employers? And what do you have against shareholders making a profit?


Nine, charitable contributions. Although I never got a job from a poor person, I have helped many in need. Charity belongs in our local communities, where we know our needs best and can use our local talent and our local resources. Butt out, please. We want to do it ourselves...


Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. Every company must sink or swim like the rest of us. If there are hard times ahead, we'll be better off just getting into it and letting the strong survive. Quick and painful. (Have you ever ripped off a Band-Aid?) We will pull together. Great things happen in America under great hardship. Give us the chance to innovate. We cannot disappoint you more than you have disappointed us.


Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? No, really, how about it? Let's have it. Let's say we give the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk.. Please stop trying to manipulate and appease me with clever wording.. I am not the idiot you obviously take me for... Stop sneaking around and meeting in back rooms making deals with your friends. It will only be a prelude to your criminal investigation. Stop hiding things from me.


Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now.
Take a breath. Listen to the people. Slow down and get some input from nonpoliticians and experts on the subject. Stop making everything an emergency. Stop speed-reading our bills into law. I am not an activist.. I am not a community organizer. Nor am I a terrorist, a militant or a violent person. I am a parent and a grandparent.. I work. I'm busy.  I am busy, and I am tired. I thought we elected competent people to take care of the business of government so that we could work, raise our families, pay our bills, have a little recreation, complain about taxes, endure our hardships, pursue our personal goals, cut our lawn, wash our cars on the weekends and be responsible contributing members of society and teach our children to be the same all while living in the home of the free and land of the brave.


I entrusted you with upholding the Constitution. I believed in the checks and balances to keep from getting far off course. What happened? You are very far off course. Do you really think I find humor in the hiring of a speed reader to unintelligently ramble all through a bill that you signed into law without knowing what it contained? I do not. 
It is a mockery of the responsibility I have entrusted to you.. It is a slap in the face. I am not laughing at your arrogance. Why is it that I feel as if you would not trust me to make a single decision about my own life and how I would live it but you should expect that I should trust you with the debt that you have laid on all of us and our children. We did not want the TARP bill... We said no. We would repeal it if we could. I am sure that we still cannot. There is needless urgency and recklessness in all of your recent spending of our tax dollars.


From my perspective, it seems that all of you have gone insane. I also know that I am far from alone in these feelings. Do you honestly feel that your current pursuits have merit to patriotic Americans? We want it to stop. We want to put the brakes on everything that is being rushed by us and forced upon us.. We want our voice back. You have forced us to put our lives on hold to straighten out the mess that you are making. We will have to give up our vacations, our time spent with our children, any relaxation time we may have had and money we cannot afford to spend on bringing our concerns to Washington .. Our president often knows all the right buzzwords like unsustainable. Well, no kidding. How many tens of thousands of dollars did the focus group cost to come up with that word? We don't want your overpriced words. Stop treating us like we're morons.


We want all of you to stop focusing on your reelection and do the job we want done, not the job you want done or the job your party wants doneYou work for us and at this rate I guarantee you not for long because we are coming. We will be heard and we will be represented.. You think we're so busy with our lives that we will never come for you? We are the formerly silent majority, all of us who quietly work, pay taxes, obey the law, vote, save money, keep our noses to the grindstone... and we are now looking at you.


You have awakened us, the patriotic freedom spirit so strong and so powerful that it had been sleeping too long.. You have pushed us too far. Our numbers are great. They may surprise you. For every one of us who will be there, there will be hundreds more that could not come.. Unlike you, we have their trust.. We will represent them honestly, rest assured.. They will be at the polls on voting day to usher you out of office.

We have cancelled vacations. We will use our last few dollars saved. We will find the representation among us and a grassroots campaign will flourish. We didn't ask for this fight. But the gloves are coming off. We do not come in violence, but we are angry. You will represent us or you will be replaced with someone who will. There are candidates among us who will rise like a Phoenix from the ashes that you have made of our constitution.


Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this... We don't care. Political parties are meaningless to us Patriotic Americans are willing to do right by us and our Constitution, and that is all that matters to us now... We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back. We entrusted you with it and you abused it. You are dishonorable. You are dishonest. As Americans we are ashamed of you. You have brought shame to us. If you are not representing the wants and needs of your constituency loudly and consistently, in spite of the objections of your party, you will be fired. Did you hear? We no longer care about your political parties. You need to be loyal to us, not to them.. Because we will get you fired and they will not save you.

If you do or can represent me, my issues, my views, please stand up. Make your identity known. You need to make some noise about it. Speak up. I need to know who you are. If you do not speak up, you will be herded out with the rest of the sheep and we will replace the whole damn congress if need be one by one.


We are coming. Are we coming for you? Who do you represent? What do you represent?

Listen. Because we are coming. We the people are coming
IP Logged
 Subject :Illinois Family Institute Voter Guide 2010.. 2010-01-09 01:30:35 
admin
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 01:18:48
Posts: 15
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Illinois Family Institute Voter Guide 2010

This Voter Guide is a compilation of information gathered from impartial candidate questionnaires, as well as voting records and publicly articulated positions. The guide is nonpartisan and it is not intended to endorse or oppose any candidate, whether explicitly or implicitly.

Click on attachment link to view document.


Attachments
 ifivgdistrict-12.pdf [232 KB] :: Voter Guide for 12th District
IP Logged
Last Edited On: 2010-01-09 01:32:43 By admin for the Reason
 Subject :Better Candidates.. 2009-09-14 22:49:14 
rdavis
Moderator
Joined: 2009-09-02 17:21:02
Posts: 14
Location
Forum : What's On Your Mind?
Topic : Better Candidates

It seems there should be a vetting process for candidates for public office. Before they can run for office they should fill out a questionnaire with specific information that can be reviewed by all and dis-proven if not true. Of course, this could mean that no one could run for public office.
IP Logged
Page # 


Powered by ccBoard


Browse this website in:
HomeForumLatest Post

facebook icon

Login

Registration is only required if you want to leave comments in the forum.